Academy of Music Issues Permanent Ban on Taylor Swift, ‘She’s Extremely Sober’
In a shocking development, the Academy of Music has made a controversial decision to issue a permanent ban on Taylor Swift, one of the world’s top music artists today. The decision has sparked outrage and controversy among the music community and fans, with many questioning the reasoning behind the decision and whether it is fair.
The permanent ban on Taylor Swift comes after a series of legal disputes involving her intellectual property and music copyrights. It has been revealed that the Academy of Music made this decision based on the fact that Taylor Swift is considered “extremely sane” in fighting for her music rights.
The dispute arose in 2019 when Scooter Braun’s Ithaca Holdings acquired Big Machine Records, where Taylor Swift signed a recording contract from 2006 to 2018. This meant that Ithaca Holdings also owned the copyrights to Taylor Swift’s first six original albums, including “Taylor Swift”, “Fearless”, “Speak Now”, “Red”, “1989” and “Reputation”.
However, Taylor Swift was not allowed to buy back these recordings, even though they were the songs she wrote and performed herself. This led to a long legal battle between her and Scooter Braun.
In the process of fighting for her music rights, Taylor Swift decided to re-record all six of her original albums, labeling them “Taylor’s Version”. These re-recorded albums not only included previously recorded songs but also added previously unreleased songs. This strategy has helped reduce the commercial value of the master recordings that Scooter Braun owns.
Finally, after years of negotiations, Taylor Swift reached an agreement to buy back all of her music copyrights, including music videos, concert films, album art, and unreleased songs. She shared: “All the music I’ve ever written belongs to me now.”
While Taylor Swift’s victory in regaining ownership of her music can be considered a laudable achievement from a legal and artistic standpoint, the permanent ban from the Academy of Music still surprised many and raised questions about its fairness.
Some legal experts believe that the permanent ban decision may be based on the view that Taylor Swift’s aggressive fight to regain ownership of her music could be seen as inappropriate or divisive in the music industry. However, Taylor Swift’s supporters argue that she is simply defending her legal rights and setting an example for other artists to protect their intellectual property.
The decision also raises questions about representation and fairness in the music industry. Many believe that a permanent ban could set a dangerous precedent for other artists trying to defend their legal rights.
Meanwhile, the fan community continues to strongly support Taylor Swift. They believe that she is a symbol of perseverance and independence in this competitive industry. Her 2.5-year “The Eras Tour” currently underway in the US also demonstrates the immense support from fans for this talented singer.
In short, the permanent ban on Taylor Swift by the Music Academy has created a heated debate about fairness and creative freedom in the music industry. While the decision may be based on her conscious actions in defending her legal rights, it still raises many questions about the talented singer’s representation and long-term career future.
News
“So your mother died? So what? Serve my guests!” my husband laughed. I served the food while tears streamed down my face. My husband’s boss took my hand and asked, “Why are you crying?” I told him.
{“aigc_info”:{“aigc_label_type”:0,”source_info”:”dreamina”},”data”:{“os”:”web”,”product”:”dreamina”,”exportType”:”generation”,”pictureId”:”0″},”trace_info”:{“originItemId”:”7581677717045710088″}} Lena Moore had been moving around like a ghost all morning. At 11:50 a.m., while mindlessly chopping vegetables, she…
My husband thought it was funny to slap me across the mouth in front of his coworkers after I made a harmless joke. The room fell silent. He leaned toward me and hissed contemptuously, “Learn your place.” I smiled slowly, wiped the blood from my lip, and calmly replied, “You just slapped the wrong woman.” What he didn’t know was that every phone in that room had just recorded the exact moment his career died.
The comment was innocent, almost a household joke taken out of context. We were at my husband’s company’s annual dinner,…
I can still hear the sharp smack of his hand before the words stung even more. “See what time it is? Get in the kitchen, you useless thing!” he roared, the children freezing behind him. I swallowed the pain, smiled, and cooked in silence. When I finally put the dishes on the table, their laughter turned into shouts. What I served that night changed everything, and I was no longer afraid.
I can still hear the snap of his hand before the words stung even more. “Do you see what time…
My abusive husband forced me, seven months pregnant, to shower under the outdoor tap in the freezing cold. He was sure his cruelty would go unnoticed. But he didn’t know my father is a multimillionaire… and the punishment was only just beginning.
My name is Lucía Álvarez , and when it all happened, I was seven months pregnant. I lived in a cold northern…
The mistress attacked the pregnant wife in the hospital… but she had no idea who her father really was…
When Laura Bennett was admitted to San Gabriel Hospital, thirty-four weeks pregnant, she thought the worst was over. The doctor assured her…
I forced a smile as my ex-husband raised his glass and mocked me: “Look, Amelia… my new wife is better than you.” Laughter rippled around the table. My hands trembled, but not from fear. I tapped my phone screen and said calmly, “Since we’re bragging… let’s listen to what you said when you thought no one was listening.” The room fell silent. His face paled. And that recording… changed everything.
I forced a smile when my ex-husband, Javier Morales , raised his glass at that engagement dinner and quipped, “Look, Amelia … my new…
End of content
No more pages to load
