On April 16, 2025, the Supreme Court of the UK made an important ruling, determining that the definition of “women” in the 2010 equal law must be based on biological gender. This can make extensive changes in the way of applying benefits based on gender, especially in spaces for women.

In this ruling, Lord Hodge stated that the Supreme Court’s judges agreed that the terms “women” and “gender” in the 2010 Equality Act mentioned “biological women” and “biological gender”. The court noted that although there are strong views from both sides, the ruling is not a victory of any party, but an important step in protecting the rights of both women and transgender communities.

This ruling comes from a long lawsuit between the Scottish government and the For Women Scotland (FWS) campaign group, regarding whether a person has a gender recognition certificate (GRC) is a woman who may be recognized as a woman under equal law.

The Supreme Court has affirmed that the protection of women’s rights must still be given priority in women’s spaces such as dressing rooms, prisons and centers to support sex victims. However, the court also emphasized that the transgender community is still protected against discrimination and harassment based on gender, and their rights are not impaired.

The FWS group has asked the Court to reject the recognition of transgender people as women in gender laws, especially in situations such as recruitment, sports and feminist organizations. They think that doing so will threaten the rights of biological women, especially feminist and lesbian groups.

After the ruling was published, feminist groups celebrated, with many emphasized that the ruling was a victory for women’s rights. However, some groups of transgender rights have criticized the ruling, saying that this is the result of movement from transgender anti -transgender networks and related to global wings.

Political leaders also have strong reactions. The leader of the Conservative Party, Kemi Badenoch, praised the ruling, said it was a victory for women and helped to end the controversy about whether women could have “penis”. Meanwhile, Mims Davies, the opposition minister of women, also praised the judgment as a “victory for reason”.

This ruling may have a great impact on how public services and spaces for women are active, including hospitals, temporary houses, and sports clubs. The Government has committed to protecting single gender spaces such as toilets and dressing rooms for women based on biological gender.

Meanwhile, the LGB Alliance and the lesbian rights protection groups said that this ruling was an important victory in the battle for lesbian rights to protect the rights of lesbians, especially in the context of increasing attacks from sex theory supporters.

The Supreme Court’s ruling is an important turning point in the prolonged debate about the rights of women and the transgender community. Although there are mixed opinions, this is a decision that can be profoundly affected by gender benefits and how public services serving people in the future.