Conservative political commentator Candace Owens has made waves again, this time directing her ire at two of ABC News’ top anchors, David Muir and Linsey Davis. Owens, known for her outspoken views and no-holds-barred criticism of mainstream media, took to social media to call for their immediate termination, branding them as a “disgrace to their profession.”

The Context Behind the Controversy

Owens’ remarks come amid increasing tensions between conservative voices and mainstream media outlets, which she frequently accuses of bias and misinformation. Although she did not elaborate on the specific incident that prompted her comments, her statement highlighted what she perceives as ongoing media dishonesty.

“David Muir and Linsey Davis are not journalists—they are propagandists,” Owens tweeted. “Their job is to inform the public, not to spin stories to fit a narrative. They’ve failed the American people and should be fired immediately.”

Criticism of Media Integrity

This is not the first time Owens has criticized major news networks. She has consistently accused outlets like ABC News, CNN, and MSNBC of operating with a partisan agenda rather than adhering to journalistic integrity. In this instance, Owens specifically targeted Muir, anchor of World News Tonight, and Davis, co-anchor of ABC News Live Prime, alleging that their reporting lacks objectivity and fairness.

Owens’ comments seem to resonate with a growing number of Americans who distrust traditional media. According to a recent Gallup poll, trust in mass media has hit historic lows, particularly among Republicans and independents.

Reactions to Owens’ Remarks

The response to Owens’ fiery statements has been divided along ideological lines. Conservative supporters applauded her for speaking out against perceived media bias, while others accused her of sensationalism and promoting divisive rhetoric.

Muir and Davis have not publicly responded to Owens’ criticism, and ABC News has declined to comment on the matter.

The Broader Media Landscape

Owens’ remarks are part of a larger conversation about the role of journalism in a politically polarized society. Critics argue that figures like Owens exploit tensions for personal gain, while her supporters claim she is shedding light on media corruption.

Regardless of the motivations behind Owens’ statements, her call for accountability highlights the challenges facing mainstream media in an era of distrust and hyper-partisanship. Whether her demand for Muir and Davis to be fired will gain traction remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: Owens has once again ignited a contentious debate.

Conclusion

Candace Owens’ scathing critique of David Muir and Linsey Davis underscores her ongoing campaign against mainstream media. While some view her as a bold truth-teller, others see her as a provocateur. As the media landscape continues to evolve, figures like Owens will undoubtedly remain central to the discourse on truth, bias, and accountability.